Comments on: This shit is bananas

By: iron-ic chef america

iron-ic chef america — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 02:30:05 +0000

[...] related: this shit is bananas [...]

By: GK

GK — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:57:08 +0000

I’ve seen some retardedly whiny internet rants in my time, but that one really reaches new depths of sheer bitter lemon. Can’t you just top yourself and be done with it?

By: but now i’m gold (hooray hooray)

but now i’m gold (hooray hooray) — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:28:14 +0000

[...] related: this shit is bananas [...]

By: WanderingPenguin

WanderingPenguin — Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:47:49 +0000

Wow. I wonder how much time was wasted putting together that “diversion”? How ironic.

I particularly found this interesting:

“if you are gay
and have hetero friends
that don’t support you
that don’t believe you are human
and deserve equal treatment under the law
kill them and then kill yourself
for being their friend”

I love how so many people are so free with advice like this… yet won’t take these steps themselves. Or are we to believe that this openly gay man does not have any hetero friends that fit that description?

A reluctant viewing of his blog has accomplished one thing, though: yet another reinforcement of my views on organized religion. So thanks for that, Ty.

By: morpho aurora

morpho aurora — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:01:54 +0000

#85, 86, 88 – well done

By: Mishee

Mishee — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:14:16 +0000

and me…

yes Andy, I do love me some italicizing! But also great, but completely unappreciated is BOLD

By: BoggyWoggy

BoggyWoggy — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:08:23 +0000

Guess Who I Dislike?
What a bonehead, #83.

By: Andy

Andy — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:00:24 +0000

Mishee, it’s because of your use of italics. It’s hypnotic.

By: Mishee

Mishee — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:50:48 +0000

wow, and I thought I didn’t have a life… let alone a glamorous enough of one for someone to want to be me!

By: Andy

Andy — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:36:39 +0000

Well, I tried to post something earlier, so here goes again.

Ty/Guess Who: Now, I read your long post, which you copied from your blog. Anyhow, I don’t have any issue with the concepts you brought up; however, terming me a sheep because I choose to divert myself occasionally by coming here and snarking about is just a little much.

If I want to have a political discussion, there are more than enough blogs I could visit, and I do.

If I want to snark about things which I find I can riff off of, then I come here.

You seem to be quite intense and very passionate. Nothing wrong with it, but I feel that I need to blow off steam at times, otherwise I’ll burn out. Obviously, to each their own.

Anyhow, there ya go.

By: Mishee

Mishee — Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:08:32 +0000

i ramble

By: dawn

dawn — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:54:35 +0000

Yes, you are correct. I don’t come to PAN to talk about presidential candidates; I come here to avoid real issues and to snark on funny notes. So what?

If you are so concerned with social perils, why did you condescend to submit a note?

At any rate, your lengthy, unpunctuated, grammatically incorrect, and rambling diatribe is completely inappropriate for this site. Not to mention boring.

Yawn.

By: claw71

claw71 — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:32:38 +0000

Guess/Ty:

This site is a diversion. It’s a fun way to break up the monotony of a typical workday. I don’t think you have enough information to pass judgement on anybody posting here.

By: the Ty that binds

the Ty that binds — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:27:21 +0000

I think this website is rather interesting. I mean it gives people time to avoid real issues that we all need to be thinking about in this country. It’s amazing how an email I sent could drum up so many comments, as we are faced with a vast amount of social perils, we are talking about a “low level clerk” at The Dallas Morning News sending out an email. The bad thing, possibly, maybe, is that I am responding. The worst thing is that what I posted under “Guess Who” won’t be addressed at all.