And yes I know how old this thread is. I only found this webite the other day.

The whole storyline flowing through the notes is massively flawed as well.

Is the door broken or not? The first note is just saying shut the door, that is all. The second note is claiming a broken door, but then goes on to say shut the door as well.

Is the sliding door broken and will not shut? If so, why the notes to shut it? The intitial note is simply saying shut the door – no suggestion of anything broken.

Second, jack all apartment buildings in Aus have sliding security/screen doors as the main entry. It’s absurb to suggest they do, as these type of doors are not condusive to security measures for frequent opening and closing.

Third, look at the soft plaster of the wall the notes are on – the outside of buildings do not have this type of render or plasterboard. It is indoors, and on a wall.

I can guarantee this is a hoax.

If you know anything about photography, you’d know the shots above were taken indoors.

And clearly the ‘author’ of the second note was referring to a supposed letter on a DOOR OUTSIDE a BUILDING where people walk past. No notes are on any door. The guy/girl sat down and wrote all the notes at once, with an intention to stick them on a door and produce something ‘funny’. Didn’t work.

Stripes – look at every single other post on here where multiple notes are used. Nearly 99% of time, people don’t bother lining them up (and especially not three ‘seperate’ people). Human behaviour naturally inclines people to stick notes up haphazardly, especially anonymous notes. The alignment suggests (not 100% confirms) a one person job.

There are another approx 50 things that point to this being a hoax as well, but oddly enough, I too don’t have that much time.

Just my opinion, but one I’d almost stake my life on.

As long as you overlook that fact that the handwriting is completely different for each note.

Similarly often things are aligned, when they are say, I don’t know… in a line?

Inside, how do you know? Last time I checked buildings often had walls on the outside too.

I could go on, but I have better things to do.

Three similarly sized pieces of paper, 3 different writers? Coincidental? Each note is stuck on the wall in the same manner, with the same length of tape. Too coincidental – this technique suggests a pattern eminating from the same person, who thought they could fool by changing tape from note to note. Each note closely and symmetrically aligned similarly points to a one person job.

The poor quality photo suggests the photographer was in a hurry – to take the pictures and take down the notes, before someone came along.

Too many holes and discrepancies in the storyline. Screendoor? Or security door? Sliding door? The second note suggests the notes are on the outside of the building, but clearly they are indoors, and not actually “on” the door as the same second note claims. The author clearly wrote three notes out at once (obvious from the clear intonations and scribe across all three notes) with a view to taking them downstairs and putting them on a door, then snapping them to put on this website.

However, I conjecture when it came to time to post all three notes down in the lobby near the door for the set-up shot, he/she changed location at the last minute for fear of being seen playing some hoax by a resident entering or leaving. Hence he/she went for a wall shot, just out of view of the main thoroughfare. The red note however, should in theory be “on” the door.

Finally, the mere mention of passive-aggression in a note is unusual in this context, given the clear-cut and circumstantial evidence they are a hoax. It suggests the author of all three notes clearly had some misplaced desire for attention to post them on this site, for a reaction I has it a guess.

Ok, so I have too much time on my hands too.

I ain’t touchin’ that nasty thing.

There are many clues which point to my conclusion.

And yes, it should not wierd you out that the scribe is similar across all three notes. Close up anal-ysis reveals identical ‘r’ strokes and other similarities. Something fishy going on around here…