Comments on: Reason #784 why you should never list your relationship status in your Facebook profile

By: when targeted advertising goes terribly, horribly wrong

when targeted advertising goes terribly, horribly wrong — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:30:44 +0000

[...] related: reason #784 why you should never list your relationship status in your facebook profile [...]

By: perfect for each other

perfect for each other — Thu, 14 May 2009 13:00:28 +0000

[...] related: reason #784 why you should never list your relationship status in your facebook profile [...]

By: snaps for schadenfreude!

snaps for schadenfreude! — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:59:51 +0000

[...] reason #784 why you should never list your relationship status in your facebook-profile extra credit: STFU, [...]

By: Monkeyspeaks

Monkeyspeaks — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:33:33 +0000

I’m sorry I hope you guys get back together!

By: liloleme

liloleme — Tue, 10 Feb 2009 19:21:41 +0000

Yeah, me three, four, five. Throughout the whole “it’s wrong, but not morally” diatribe I was trying to figure out what PI’s point was in the first place.

By: charles darwin

charles darwin — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 16:24:25 +0000

if you’re going to cite biology and evolution, you should take a look at the bonobos. their society clearly shows that sex also has SOCIOLOGICAL purposes as well. don’t get it twisted.

By: red ink

red ink — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:00:01 +0000

Just because something happens in nature does not mean it is beneficial to a species.
All mutations are natural. Very few are beneficial.

Nature/evolution does not follow any intelligent lines. So the argument that homosexuality is some type of population control mechanism is outlandish.

Homosexuality and homosexual behaviour are not necessarily the same subjects.
The Greeks did practice bisexuality which involved homosexual behaviours by heterosexual men.

By: sizeXS

sizeXS — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:16:30 +0000

And to end on a positive:
At least “politicallyincorrect” learned to spell.

By: The Sneak

The Sneak — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:47:23 +0000

Ouch.
Well, it’s officially facebook official.

By: alicevangeline

alicevangeline — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:41:35 +0000

I’m confused. Does Billy disagree about Slade being single, or about the other comment that it’s fun to be single?

By: Mrs Duggar

Mrs Duggar — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:51:37 +0000

I agree that it is my moral responsibility to keep procreating until such time as my uterus falls out. 18 kids is nothing. We’re hoping for at least 30.

In the Bible God told us to go forth and multiply.

Even though that passage was written at a time in history when the world population was roughly the current population of the state of New Jersey, and the population has gotten a wee bit bigger since then, and human overpopulation has contributed to the deaths of countless other species, I choose to take that Bible passage literally because I am devoid of brain cells.

Mrs Duggar

PS I also choose to overlook my husbands Playgirl collection.

By: tinkerbell2

tinkerbell2 — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:36:35 +0000

Nice of him to drop by, though. He seemed just super. As a lesbian, I’d totally do him – he’s shown me the error of my ways. Come back, PI, come back!

By: tinkerbell2

tinkerbell2 — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 13:27:23 +0000

“Actually, he’s gay, so it would be Cher.”

Right, because gay guys *hate* Madonna..

By: Yoheimizrahi

Yoheimizrahi — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 12:16:05 +0000

Exactly, Heroin. What the hell does this have to do with the PAN discussion anyway. I believe this man is a… TROLL. *cue the dramatics*