The reason, jinx, that organisations are called ‘Gay and Lesbian’ is to include everyone – men who describe themselves as gay, women ditto, and women who prefer the term lesbian. Yes, lesbians ARE gay, so the term ‘gay’ could cover both men and women – but the tendency is to include both words to make it clear that the organisation covers all bases and doesn’t alienate women who dislike the term ‘gay’.

Alright? Alright. Good.

Honestly, I’m so baffled by people like you who assume their experience is the only one. Do you know how many billions of people there are in the world? Yet because YOU have never noticed a woman describing herself as gay you assume no woman ever does. And don’t even get me started on the graph paper.

I would suggest that you are, in fact, Greg and that your ‘social life’ is limited to, ahem, photographic websites where the women are described as ‘lesbians’ . Perhaps you would be less likely to click on ‘gay female porn’ than ‘lesbian porn’.

PS: I do not believe I criticized any p/a note on this thread. I did quote the Bible and make a kinda lame joke based on that, took exception to some spectacularly bad logic and attempted to play a help-desk employee, but I’m pretty sure I didn’t even excoriate poor Greg once, although he deserves it.

Contrary to your belief, “gay” is a gender-neutral term.

Damn! Almost had that new word memorized.
Work on it…someday they will let you on the short bus instead of insisting your parents drop you off.

WTF is “naracistic”? Should ‘Glo see a physician?
Sorry to ask so many questions, but I have limited mental abilities…as does everyone else, except you. You’ve shown a limitless ability to screw-up the English language.

I’m happy that you have your own mind, though I can’t think of anyone who has someone else’s…except in a few Star Trek episodes. Do you suspect us of performing Vulcan mind-melds?

*just keep ‘em talking, jim. we’re almost within transporter range…*