Comments on: Napoleon Dynamite Complex

By: Renagade676

Renagade676 — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:39:40 +0000

I wouldn’t.

Tater tots=like
Pork rinds=love
Reeses peanut butter cups=lust

Don’t get your signals crossed!

By: park rose

park rose — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:55:00 +0000

Bad advice. Tots make war, yet pretend to be politicians. I think that’s the problem.

By: infant tyrone

infant tyrone — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 07:54:38 +0000

Careful, though,
don’t get too close in a crowded room,
since everybody knows that
ABSINTHE

By: Crystal

Crystal — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:58:41 +0000

http://actinglikeanimals.com/2009/11/29/youre-fired/

Speaking of comb-over…

By: Crystal

Crystal — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 05:49:31 +0000

We’ve been doing it wrong all along.
All the world’s problems can be solved with a healthy serving of Tater Tots.

Make tots, not war.

By: Wordtinker doesnt smith

Wordtinker doesnt smith — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:37:19 +0000

Did you miss the obvious? “(a balding 40 year – old male)” and “I do not work in an establishment that serves tater tots,” are euphemisms for “guy is a real fucking moron who should be forced to wear the unitard while dancing with THX Sandra”

By: lolsuz

lolsuz — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:19:15 +0000

The Uban Dictionary defines verbal diarrhea as “A condition suffered by an individual who has the inablility to shut the fuck up, e.i. the words keep flowing.”

You think I’m bad here, you should hear my internal dialogue. On second thought, just be glad you can’t.

By: park rose

park rose — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:15:38 +0000

She’s a hipster in spirits.

By: infant tyrone

infant tyrone — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:45:11 +0000

rose,
Don’t know whether that Brazilian’s one
to wax poetic or wax rhapsodic.
Perhaps etymology will shed some light on its roots.

By: Nick Noehm

Nick Noehm — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:33:59 +0000

Dom-genius Rose spanks sub-genius Suz!

By: park rose

park rose — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:15:05 +0000

Suz’s argument reads a bit like Adam’s argument on justifying cheating a few entries back.

Adam, are you moonlighting?

By: park rose

park rose — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:11:46 +0000

I think she’s female because I’ve got a feeling that a guy wouldn’t write “a 40 year old male”. Maybe “a balding 40 year old prick”, or a nicer euphemism (yes, Wade, I know it’s a tautology – kind of). The “male” is kind of redundant in that sentence, too, as suz has pointed out. It seems that as attention is being brought to the gender, I’d hazard a guess a non-balding female wrote it. I’m running with gg’s summary of just how good an apology note it was, though.

Oh, and suz, no, not familiar. Nor with Buddy Christ. No need to explain, Dogma fans, really.

By: infant tyrone

infant tyrone — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 23:05:25 +0000

@4.26
No squab-ble w/ your analysis,
but you might try tightening up on the length.
Changing ‘depilitated’ to ‘depilated’ would be a start.

By: Bethany

Bethany — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:31:03 +0000

Unless they are smothered in chili and covered with cheese — mmmm, chili-cheese tots!