I don’t know whether you’re a right-wing zealot, but you’ve got their “When you’re guilty of something, scream as loud and as often as you can that someone else did it” act pretty much down pat. A right-wing zealot, or one of the 6-year-olds you’re so fond of.

“No matter how we’re provoked, we’re still responsible for how we react.”

Tell me, how have you reacted my to provocations? Name calling, degrading comments, total disrespect, half truths, misrepresentations, made-up imaginary meanings and an unabashed expression of dislike, hatred even. All internet equivalents of road rage. Who again do you say is responsible for your actions and reactions? I think you said that would be you (“No matter how we’re provoked, we’re still responsible for how we react.”), so shifting blame to me just kind of makes you look silly. Surely doesn’t make you any better than bad old CB, now does it?

Someone told you off. So what?! Get over it, people tell me off on the site all the time, and yes, grow the fuck up. Don’t let it hurt your feelings.

Your own words did it, as these things so often PAN out.

Don’t be mad at me, I just let the line play out. I enjoy exposing hypocrites any chance I get, and am not above doing a little baiting to get them to expose themselves. You took hook, line and sinker and got pulled into the boat. Get over it. That’s what happens to my trolls.

Which reminds me, I have to get ready for a fishing trip this weekend!

I’m not sure how you got from ‘vigilante justice’ to ‘caped crusader’ but you maybe want to look it up in a dictionary some day (hint: vigilante does not mean a comic book superhero). I suppose that is assuming you can read for content, which maybe be an unfair assumption since the difference between ‘then’ and ‘than’ is foreign to you.

Another word you should look up is ‘implied’ since you’ll find it is exactly what you said it’s not.

No, Jefe, I merely implied in as polite of a manner that I can muster that you should keep your mouth shut, not telling you to outright shut up which I didn’t. And seriously, Mr High and Mighty Grammar Master, I could OF added could HAVE but I simply just don’t because I don’t have to appeal to the likes of someone such as yourself. If you you have a problem with other peoples grammar, then I suggest you get off here and get yourself a degree in english literature so you can put it to good use teaching impressionable future children how to use proper grammar instead of wasting your time criticizing adults on the internet who don’t honestly give a shit. You don’t like how I write then stop fucking reading my posts! Also I know what “rationalize” means fuck you very much.

At: “[I]’d rather deal with the consequences of a broken windshield then suffer the consequences from the error of someone elses judgment.” Meaning by taking the action that I did I knew that there would be consequences to what I had done and accepted it for what it was, I didn’t have to stay but it all happened so fast that I just happened to of stayed. I’d rather take responsibility for my actions then being hit by a car and having to suffer the pain and agony caused from someones bad choice. Sorry you don’t have the mental capacity to understand this, but your inability to understand is not my problem.

Also, you can’t reinstate someone’s story with “facts” when you WERE NOT THERE! You can try all you like but you just can’t. The only people who have and know the true facts are myself, the driver, her boyfriend and the police. Not you.

And what the fuck.. Vigilante justice? Seriously? I did not wake up that morning to put on my leather tights and flowing pink cape to start my day as the pregnant masked tickling crusader prowling the streets on a cloudy day on campus, hellbent on serving much needed justice on some dumb, texting, female driver who was driving recklessly because it simply “felt right”. Sorry to burst your comic book insinuations but what I did was not any way, shape, or form Vigilantism.

I say this again, get off your elevated velcro high horse before you end up getting bucked off and hitting that mighty big inflated head of yours. I’m done with you.

I’ve told you quite clearly and in no uncertain terms a number of times above that I intended insult…and insult you I did, you’ve proven that quite well. Mission accomplished.
Is that so hard to accept?

No matter what it was, it’s really about time you got over it, don’t you think? After all, you’re not above tossing out an insult or two yourself.

Let me restate this in a way that you may understand better. The following statement of yours makes zero fucking sense:

“[I]’d rather deal with the consequences of a broken windshield then suffer the consequences from the error of someone elses judgment.”

If by “the consequences from the error of someone else[']s judgment” you mean being hit by a c-bomb of a driver then at NO point were you offered the choice “Hey lady, would you rather be hit by a car or bonk this bitch driver on the windshield?”

Furthermore, your statement that because I wasn’t there I can’t say what someone COULD do (caps since this words seems challenging for you) is utterly ludicrous and against the very concept of the Internet as it exists today. Readers are often a large mob who support the kind of vigilante justice you dished out. You’ll notice at no point did I judge your actions, just restate them as facts. You responded to someone committing a moderate crime by committing a minor one. You were in a dangerous situation and took steps to stay in it because it felt right.

Implying an adult stranger on the Internet should shut up is about as effective and productive as it was when you were 7 on the playground.

El Jefe, a.k.a. “No, YOUU shut up!”

P.S. Concerning ‘rationalize’ I do not think that that word means what you think it means

Wow. You keep changing your story too fast for me to keep up. First it was justified because I “attacked” you first, then it was an innocent plea to show decency, now you admit it’s an insult but are back to trying to pretend that I “attacked” you first.

Where the heck do you get this one from? I wasn’t saying anything to or about you or your intelligence in that post, unless you’re a 6-year-old or a cat. (Which one is it?)

Unless you think I specifically meant you when I said “most humans”? If you seriously imagine that a stranger who talks in general terms about society must be specifically thinking about you… that’s just sad, not amusing.

C’mon, it’s a lot more fun when you’re mind-bogglingly outrageous. Tepidly dumb and vaguely paranoid are boring.

That’s really very straightforward, I don’t know why you insist it’s supposed to mean any more than it does.
I don’t understand why you insist everything I say has some hidden meaning as part of some vast web of information manipulation…like I’m the villain in some 1960′s TV show, but I assure you, I am not The Riddler.
However, if you insist upon hanging stubbornly on to negative feelings over something so far in the past, you can continue to do so.

No skin off my banana…I’m not the one trying to prove they’re the victim.

More fun with quotes… would care to explain why my horrible attack on you immediately following the debated posts (that was sarcasm again, though that won’t stop you from immediately claiming the new blatant lie of “Look, look, he admitted to making ‘a horrible attack’ on me!”) of

You didn’t ask for studies, you asked what people think.

If you want links for my assertion of fact, here you go: (linkspam)

supposedly justified this innocent, polite, taken-out-of-context response from you? (emphasis added)

Didn’t ask about animal abuse statistics…asked about whether or not cats are as smart as 6 year-old human children. Really a very simple question for a sane person to answer.

Pay attention, you’re being blinded by your animal advocacy…and reacting like one.

I was saying “have you no decency” because you tried to make it seem as though all I said to you was “Grow the fuck up” and didn’t originally provide the entire statement or any context…thereby painting me in the harshest possible light. I never tried to link the two phrases in any way shape or form. The phrase came to mind only because Joseph McCarthy would often take something someone said, use it out of context and use that to accuse them of being a Commie, but at no time did I ever attempt to even remotely make it seem like “grow the fuck up” was meant to mean “have you no decency”…”Grow the fuck up” was purely and simply meant to mean “GROW THE FUCK UP”…no hidden agenda there.

I really can’t see how you get to trying to spin anything into anything else unless you’re just into conspiracy theories.

You accuse me of lies, but post pieces of comments out of context to give false impressions and call that truth.

What do you read, out of that entire passage? Only the five words you want to see: ZOMG XOMG XOMH!1!!! You admitted you attacked me, see see see you said “cleverly hidden attack on you”. That proves it1!!1

Then you go on to try to spin yourself into orbit, re-interpreting your “Grow the fuck up” in a childishly disingenuous fashion as somehow meaning “Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?”

Ah, if only Joseph Welsh had your intelligence. He could have shortened himself considerably if only he had known “Grow the fuck up” actually means “Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?” It’s too bad he couldn’t be as compassionate and civil as you, because I’m sure McCarthy (or anyone) would have fallen to his knees in gratitude for such sage, profound advice as “Grow the fuck up”. Too bad that you have me instead, who misunderstands those wonderful words of wisdom as an insult.

Why do I keep responding to you, CB? The same reason everyone else comes to this site – to be amused by astoundingly dumb behavior. In this case, watching you try to squirm out of an outrageous lie by redefining up as down in seven different ways. Please, continue. XD

Never said I didn’t say it. Where do you get these things from? I said I wouldn’t say it unless there was a reason to say it (“…CB wouldn’t say “Grow the fuck up” unless …”).
Try reading, it helps here.

You’ve already admitted to the supposedly clever attack in your previous post (or have you forgotten “cleverly hidden attack on you (rather than a joke about most 6-year-olds not being smarter than the average cat)” so soon?), but thanks for posting the link that shows that I was dealing with someone else and you came to me, not the other way ’round.

Show you where you attacked me prior to that post? Why? This is the post wherein you attacked me. Why the hell would I have to find a prior example? You think I need you to attack more than once before I respond? That there’s a level of shit I must take before striking back?
Well, there isn’t. I’ll strike back whenever I’m of a mood to do so, and laugh back when that’s the mood that strikes me. There’s no predicting it, so just take it as it comes as I do…like most of this page where you attacked and I gave responses such as “Aw, Haterade, I can feel the ♥” and left the situation alone even as you continued to spout off about what you happen to not like about me…but I’m the troll, right? “Wrt your “alter ego” or “persona” which allows you to gleefully piss on other people for the fun of seeing how they react – do you really not know what the meaning of “troll” is in modern Internet parlance?” do you really want to play Pots and Kettles Mr./Ms. cleverly hidden attack?

In the interest of context, and more importantly of setting the record straight on this matter, what I said to you was not a simple “Grow the fuck up” as you would have had us believe above, in a childishly disingenuous fashion I might add (“Have you no sense of decency sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?”)
What I said was:

“Okay, let’s say some of these people care about their cats’ happiness and love them as family members…would they let their 6 year-old child run loose in the streets all day without supervision, or would they say that would be unsafe for a child? Do they think a cat has anywhere near the intelligence of a 6 year-old human?”
You followed as your first post on the thread with your “hidden attack” as you call it: “Actually, yes. Not that I think highly of the intelligence of cats, just that I don’t think most humans are nearly as “intelligent” as they give themselves credit for,”

Then, and only then, I responded:

“I applaud your advocacy, but mix in a little bit of perspective. Those comments are JOKES. Grow the fuck up!”

I STAND BY THAT STATEMENT!!
You took nothing from my applauding your advocacy for stray animals, nothing from my basically asking you to chill out just a bit, and nothing from my pointing out that what you were upset about were mere jokes.
You just got butt-hurt because I advised you to grow the fuck up?!
What kind of sick motherfucker takes a snippet of a comment so to heart that they cannot see the rest of it and happily agrees that someone else must be off their meds?

Well, please do so (gtfu). That wasn’t all that bad of a piece of advice. I hope you’ll take it…or the meds.

I see your habit of focusing on only one part of what was said and using it out of context remains in place. Sorry I didn’t remember the thread or our spat, but, as I said, I really don’t pay much mind to these things. You’re just not that important in my life…no hard feelings about that I hope.

Here’s a hint for ya, Sparky…if you think I’m such a troll, maybe it’s best not to feed my ginormous ego.

I guess I’ll close with a bit of wisdom from…surprise!!…you…:

“As they say, opinions are like a-holes. Everyone has one, and no one ever thinks that theirs stinks. (^_~)”